The Spanish Prisoner ****

511K6VXTH5L._SY445_SpanishPrisonerImage

One Liner Review:

David Mamet’s best film, this is a mystery-noir that keeps things eerie and suspenseful as both the clues and twists pile up.

Brief Review:

A perfect mystery, this one is remeniscent of some of the greats, like the usual suspects and north by northwest. it takes its time to build relationships and situations, letting us know that there are clues to be paying attention to, without knowing exactly why. the movie does fine work with details and music and setting the mood of a creepy film noir atmosphere where you can’t trust anyone. all of the acting is great, but steve martin is the standout, being dark and serious in ways that we’ve never seen of him beofre. for writer / director david mamet, this movie is a crowning achievment, really thrilling us and keeping us on our toes, excited to figure out what the clues mean.

REVIEW:

The Spanish Prisoner is a fantastic mystery. It moves in such a way where you can tell that every detail is important and big things are coming, but you can never be sure of from where and by whom. The mystery involves strangers and ancient wisdom about how to protect an interest that you have, which others want. The movie is about stolen property and the idea that you never really know who someone is when you meet him.

 

At the start of the movie we meet Joe Ross (Campbell Scott), who is on a business trip in the Bahammas. He’s there with his lawyer, George (Ricky Jay), his boss, Mr. Klein, (Ben Gazarra) and the companies new secretary, Susan (Rebecca Pidgeon). The reason for the meeting is because Joe has a process which is going to be revolutionary and will make the company a lot of money. We never get any real details about what exactly the process is, and watching the movie tip toe around that is actually masterful, especially considering there is a whole meeting early on about the process with character literally asking, “what do we own?” And the question is answered, yet we still walk away with no idea what it is. Amazing. And of course the movie is doing that on purpose, having fun with us, as if it is an exercise.Knowing what the process actually is most certainly is not important. It’s a McMuffin if ever there was one, and the movie quickly moves on to the characters and the mystery.

 

 

It’s while on this trip that joe notices a sea plane fly by and land off in the distance. Then a boat sails over to them from the area of the plane, and a man and woman get out. Joe and the secretary are taking pictures when the man, Jimmy Dell (Steve Martin, like you’ve never seen him before), approaches him. He offers Joe a thousand dollars for the camera, and as a gesture of good faith, Joe just gives it over. Now, there’s a lot happening here under the surface. Characters are doing all sorts of things to make Joe let down his guard. They do this by giving him something to be suspicious about, only to make him realize that he was wrong to be suspicious. The reason for this is so that when he is suspicious about something that actually does matter (giving over the process,) he will second guess himself and tell himself that he’s just being ridiculous.

 

Two of these things that happen early on, where characters are trying to get him to let down their guard (spoilers ahead,) are Susan telling him that Dell was never on the sea plane (making Joe suspicious of Dell, only for us to hear from Susan that photos came back later, revealing that Dell was, indeed, on the plane,) and Dell giving Joe a wrapped package to deliver to his sister, in New York. Susan mentions the idea to Joe that they always ask you at security, did anyone give you something to bring back with you, and Joe gets suspicious of the package. He immediately goes to the bathroom, tears off the wrapping, and is relieved to see it is indeed, just a book, and nothing illegal that Dell has given him to deliver.

 

Getting back to the vacation in the Bahammas, Dell and Joe go to have a drink later on that night, and Dell explains everything. He is vacationing with a woman who is a married princess, and with who he is having an affair.. That’s why he doesn’t want there to be any photographs that catch her in the background to show that she was there, or which catch both of them in the background together. The funny thing about this elaborate story of the secret affair and not getting caught, is that it’s a tiny side plot, and in no way related to the main storyline of the movie. And it’s that elaborate. That’s how great this movie is. Like Tarantino’s films, it can invent whole other storylines, mention them in the dialogue (the story of the guy in Pulp Fiction who gave Mia Wallace a foot massage and got thrown through a window), and actually have nothing to do with them as part of the films real story. It’s like, when the story that comes up in just dialogue is actually more interested than most real movies, you know the movie is good.

 

Joe and Dell plan to meet up in New York in about a week. Dell asks Joe to drop the book off for his sister in New York, since joe will be getting there a week before him. Joe does this when he arrives in new york, but the circumstances surrounding it are strange. After dropping the book off for Dell’s sister, Joe goes to meet Dell a week later for dinner. Dell helps welcome joe into the world of the rich and elite. he gets joe a membership at a private club and even opens joe up a swiss bank account. this movie is very smart with the details to the point where everything is justified. we see why joe needs to join the club, in order to have dinner there, as well as why he wants a swiss bank account (the bank is not allowed to discuss how much money is in the account, and so it looks pretty cool to have one, even with nothing in it.)

 

the first hour of this movie is all setup and clues. the actual crime or mystery doesn’t unfold until after that, and the amazing accomplishment is that even without a mystery, mamet’s screenplay and vision are able to hold our attention and keep us glued to the screen for the entire time. chalk that up to his fascinating dialogue, characters, and feel that something creepy is happening behind the scenes, even if we don’t know what it is yet.

 

once the mystery does get underway, this film suddenly becomes like north by northwest or any other movie where a regular guy is caught in a game that he never saw coming. despite having similarities to other movies in the film noir genre, this film still manages to be it’s own thing, complete with fantastic direction and music. it’s also nice that there are so many characters and situations to be suspicious of that the net of who we can’t trust or be certain about gets very large.

 

the spanish prisoner is by far and away mamet’s best film. it’s red belt after that, which has a lot of similarities to this movie with a similar crime and mystery. only the spanish prisoner really gets that guy on the street, running around, trying to avoid the cops and also solve the mystery at the same time, kind of feel. the sound of the movie is perfect, combining spooky jazz music with many moments of silence. all of the actors are great here, and steve martin in particular is serious and darker than ever. what a cool movie.